Climate change is enshittifying everything
Just like Big Tech is enshittifying our experiences online, Big Oil is enshittifying our time here on Earth.
Hey there,
Earlier this month I had an experience — quite a sad experience — that made me write this piece for The Boston Globe, which I wanted to share with you. Thanks for taking a look.
It should have been such a lovely moment. Two little boys who live down the road rang our doorbell on a recent afternoon and asked if our 4-year-old son could come outside and play. I never grew up with a self-assembling crew of neighborhood kids, but it always seemed like a marvelous thing for a child to have. So I felt real joy as I turned and called for our son, ready to send him off to join his first little street troop.
But then my wife reminded me — weren’t we trying to keep the kids inside today?
I’d momentarily forgotten. For four days in a row earlier this month, we, like millions of Americans across the Midwest and Northeast, had been living under a haze of poor air quality. For four days, the sky was an undifferentiated gray and the sun stayed slightly blurry behind a film of smog. And for four days, every breath we took outside felt ever so slightly chalky, like it was coating the inside of our mouths with a touch of residue.
That residue is all that remains of forests located thousands of miles away, burned up in the massive wildfires raging across Canada this summer. The sheer scale of these conflagrations is hard to wrap your head around: Over 16.3 million acres have burned in 2025, larger than Connecticut, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, and Vermont combined. Hundreds of millions of trees and countless animals have gone up in the smoke that has covered our skies, filled our air, and penetrated our lungs, causing imminent health threats for many and contributing to long-term damage to the health of millions more. As UMass Lowell environmental health professor Joel Tickner said of the air quality that first week of August, “The level of danger is real, and you want to prevent exposure if you can.”
These fires are not natural disasters. They’re a predictable consequence of climate change, caused by the burning of fossil fuels. Mike Flannigan, the research chair for fire science at Thompson Rivers University, put it this way: “This is our new reality … The warmer it gets, the more fires we see.” And the unrelenting physics of this crisis means these are climate disasters in more ways than one. Canada’s 2023 wildfires released 3 billion tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, or nearly four times the carbon emissions of the global aviation sector. And 2025 is on track to match this record.
None of this is breaking news. But that is what has been scaring me the most this summer. Two years ago, when the smoke from the Canadian wildfires was similarly intense, it was a huge story. And I don’t just mean in the media, where the image of New York City’s hazy orange skyline became ubiquitous. Where I live, in Providence, it felt like the madness of the wildfires came up in practically every conversation. And no wonder! Our world was filled with carcinogenic smoke from fires so mind-meltingly massive they were affecting us from thousands of miles away. It was eerie, it was unsettling, and it was not something any of us could accept as normal.
But it turns out we can, in fact, accept these smoke-filled skies as normal. This year, in my circles, people barely mentioned the air quality around us. Yes, it’s been unpleasant — in fact, the experience for my family has been harder this summer. We have a 3-month-old now, and it was an extra challenge to be cooped up with him inside all day, unable to take him on a stroller walk to help him fall asleep. But it was unpleasant in a way that already is becoming just “the way things are.”
There’s a viral post that gets reshared during every extreme weather event: “Climate change will manifest as a series of disasters viewed through phones with footage that gets closer and closer to where you live until you’re the one filming it.” As I stood in the doorway of my home earlier this month, debating with my wife whether or not we would let our child join his 6-year-old neighbors waiting patiently on our porch, ready to jump and laugh and race each other down our block, it occurred to me that climate change is manifesting in another insidious way: enshittification.
This term was coined by author Cory Doctorow to describe how online platforms decline in quality over time as tech corporations degrade their services, little by little, to maximize their profits. But it aptly describes how our lives are changing in this era of climate crisis.
Just as our experiences online are being steadily enshittified by Big Tech companies, our time on this earth is being steadily enshittified by Big Oil companies and their allies in the federal government.
These climate-denying bastards are driving the extreme weather disasters devastating communities across the country. But that’s not all they’re doing. They are also forcing on us a million smaller — but still, in aggregate, incredibly hurtful — degradations: summers filled with weeks too hot to enjoy; winters with fewer snow days; walks in the woods marred by more ticks; and increasingly frequent negotiations between parents and kids about the safety of going outside to play when doing so means breathing in toxins that will bury themselves in our bodies and never come out.
Humans are incredibly adaptable. And this may be the best reason to hope that, as a species at least, we will survive the coming climate breakdowns. But our ability to just keep trucking while the world around us gets shittier and shittier, while the water comes closer and closer to a boil — as the frog knows, it has its downsides.
Ultimately, we let our son join his friends. But we allowed just 20 minutes of play before I went to retrieve him. As we were walking, hand in hand, back up the road to our house, he looked up at the hazy sky and said, “The sun is less shiny today. But it’s still pretty.” I looked up, too. “Yeah, I guess it is,” I said.
Maybe inviting the neighborhood children inside for games or something could be an alternative too.
I support what Aaron has written.
Mark's Comment makes little sense, unless read as a climate denier saying that the lies are good. The reason I say that is every new thing coming out says the situation is worsening rapidly. Is Mark saying something to refute that or was it just poorly worded?